This guide demonstrates how to use the
built-in
function matchN
as a field validator.
The current implementation of matchN
is inspired by JSON Schema’s
oneOf
,
anyOf
,
allOf
, and
not
concepts.
This guide shows how those concepts can be encoded in CUE, using this
pre-release
version of the cue
command:
$ cue version
cue version v0.11.0
...
Basic use
The matchN
function takes two arguments:
- a number constraint;
- a list of constraints.
The function validates a field’s value by unifying the value with each item in the list of constraints in turn, and keeping count of how many list items the field’s value is able to unify with. A field’s value is valid if the count unifies successfully with the number constraint:
package basic
A: 42
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(1, [int])
A: matchN(2, [int, >10])
A: matchN(2, [int, >10, >100])
B: 42
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(1, [int, >10])
B: matchN(3, [int, >10, >100])
$ cue vet .:basic
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 1:
./basic.cue:11:4
./basic.cue:9:4
./basic.cue:11:11
./basic.cue:12:4
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 3:
./basic.cue:12:4
./basic.cue:9:4
./basic.cue:11:4
./basic.cue:12:11
“One of”
With its number constraint set to 1
the matchN
function checks that a
field’s value unifies successfully with just one of the list of
constraints:
package oneOf
import "math"
A: 42
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(1, [int])
A: matchN(1, [>10, >100, string])
A: matchN(1, [math.MultipleOf(3), math.MultipleOf(5)])
B: 42
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(1, [int, >10])
B: matchN(1, [string, >100])
C: 15
// C fails to validate.
C: matchN(1, [math.MultipleOf(3), math.MultipleOf(5)])
$ cue vet .:oneOf
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 1:
./one-of.cue:13:4
./one-of.cue:11:4
./one-of.cue:13:11
./one-of.cue:14:4
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 0 matched, expected 1:
./one-of.cue:14:4
./one-of.cue:11:4
./one-of.cue:13:4
./one-of.cue:14:11
C: invalid value 15 (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 1:
./one-of.cue:18:4
./one-of.cue:16:4
./one-of.cue:18:11
“Any of”
If the number constraint is set to >0
, the function checks that at least
one of the list of constraints unifies with the field’s value:
package anyOf
A: 42
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(>0, [>10])
A: matchN(>0, [int, >0, >100, string])
B: 42
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(>0, [string, >100])
$ cue vet .:anyOf
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 0 matched, expected >0:
./any-of.cue:10:4
./any-of.cue:8:4
./any-of.cue:10:11
“All of”
To check that a field’s value unifies successfully with all of the list of constraints, set the number constraint to a value matching the number of items in the list:
package allOf
import "math"
A: 42
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(1, [int])
A: matchN(2, [int, >10])
A: matchN(4, [int, >10, <100, math.MultipleOf(2)])
B: 42
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(3, [int, >10, >100])
B: matchN(4, [int, >10, <100, math.MultipleOf(41)])
$ cue vet .:allOf
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 3:
./all-of.cue:13:4
./all-of.cue:11:4
./all-of.cue:13:11
./all-of.cue:14:4
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 3 matched, expected 4:
./all-of.cue:14:4
./all-of.cue:11:4
./all-of.cue:13:4
./all-of.cue:14:11
“Not”
If you set the number constraint to 0
then matchN
checks that a
field’s value doesn’t unify successfully with any of the list of
constraints:
package not
import (
"strings"
"struct"
)
A: 42
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(0, [string])
A: matchN(0, [bytes, struct.MinFields(0)])
A: matchN(0, [>100, strings.HasPrefix("4")])
B: 42
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(0, [int])
B: matchN(0, [string, number])
B: matchN(0, [42, >100, strings.HasSuffix("4")])
$ cue vet .:not
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 1 matched, expected 0:
./not.cue:16:4
./not.cue:14:4
./not.cue:16:11
./not.cue:17:4
./not.cue:18:4
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 1 matched, expected 0:
./not.cue:17:4
./not.cue:14:4
./not.cue:16:4
./not.cue:17:11
./not.cue:18:4
B: invalid value 42 (does not satisfy matchN): 1 matched, expected 0:
./not.cue:18:4
./not.cue:14:4
./not.cue:16:4
./not.cue:17:4
./not.cue:18:11
More complex uses
References
Either argument to matchN
can be resolved through a reference:
package allButOne
// A validates successfully.
A: 42
A: matchN(len(#C)-1, #C)
// B fails to validate.
B: 42.0
B: matchN(len(#C)-1, #C)
#C: [number, int, >100]
$ cue vet .:allButOne
B: invalid value 42.0 (does not satisfy matchN): 1 matched, expected 2:
./all-but-one.cue:9:4
./all-but-one.cue:8:4
./all-but-one.cue:9:11
Composite data structures
The matchN
function can validate composite data structures, not just
primitive values. Use it with both structs and lists:
package composite
// A validates successfully.
A: matchN(>0, [#C1, #C2]) & {
x: 42
y: 4.2
}
// B fails to validate.
B: matchN(>0, [#C1, #C2]) & {
x: 4.2 // Not an int.
y: 4.2 // Not a string.
z: 4.2
}
#C1: {x!: int, ...}
#C2: {
y!: string
z?: float
...
}
// D validates successfully.
D: [1, 2, 3] & matchN(1, [#F1, #F2, #F3])
// E fails to validate.
E: [11, 12, 13] & matchN(1, [#F1, #F2, #F3])
#F1: [...>0]
#F2: [...>10]
#F3: [...>100]
$ cue vet .:composite
B: invalid value {x:4.2,y:4.2,z:4.2} (does not satisfy matchN): 0 matched, expected >0:
./composite.cue:9:4
./composite.cue:9:11
E: invalid value [11,12,13] (does not satisfy matchN): 2 matched, expected 1:
./composite.cue:24:19
./composite.cue:24:4
./composite.cue:24:26
The sub-optimal error reporting for field E
is tracked in issue #3389.
Future enhancements
The current release of matchN
does not consider hidden fields or definitions
when checking for a match:
package helperFields
A: matchN(1, [#A]) & {
_foo: "a string"
#bar: "another string"
}
#A: {
_foo: int
#bar: !="another string"
}
# This command currently succeeds:
$ cue vet .:helperFields
This behaviour may change with future CUE releases.
If support for hidden fields or definitions is important to how you would like
to use matchN
, please join the CUE community
and tell us about your use case.